Family History

Child naming trends have always been strange — and a sign of the times

Napoleon Bonaparte McClain with his wife Angeline P. Harrison. They married in 1861 two years before he joined the Union Army. In an armed conflict during the war he lost part of his hand and a finger.

Napoleon Bonaparte McClain with his wife Angeline P. Harrison. They married in 1861 two years before he joined the Union Army. In an armed conflict during the war he lost part of his hand and a finger.

As a family historian I have come across my share of unusual names which seem to follow certain traditions. For example, Biblical names seemed to be popular with my paternal family line in the 18th and 19th centuries. Manurvia appears several times in my maternal line and I have stumbled across Permelia in my wife’s linage.

When I read some of the names, though, I am reminded of the Seinfeld episode where George reveals the two perfect names (Soda and Seven) — one he offers up to his fiance’s friends. When they balk saying Soda doesn’t seem like a name. He responds.

“Do you think Blanche sounded good the first time people heard it?” he asks.

Here are a list of a the most unique names I have found so far.

Named after famous people

I don’t know exactly what it means when you give your child the exact same name of a well-known person other than an obvious endorsement of that individual. It does beg the question, though, what if during the child’s life their namesake becomes disliked or dishonored. In my wife’s lineage — a distant grandfather — is named Napoleon Bonaparte McClain. Since the real Napoleon died in 1821 –and Napoleon Bonaparte McClain was born in 1839, he was at least free from the possibility of any real-time life scandals involving his namesake. In my wife’s lineage there is also a Christopher Columbus born in the late 1800s.

Presidential names 

In my maternal line I have a distant grandfather who lived in northern Tennessee named Alexander Beaty — whose father Andrew was one of the Overmountain men during the American Revolutionary War. Alexander was very patriotic when it came to his children — naming one James Knox Polk and another Andrew Jackson. Andrew Jackson, along with his brother Thomas and brother-in-law Andrew Owens would die young, having the misfortune of being captured during the U.S. Civil War. All three men died in Confederate POW camps.

Biblical Names

In the Claywell line, there are multiple instances of Shadrach — and even a Meshach and Abednego. Peter, Solomon  (sorry not Paul) and Mary were also common in the Claywell lineage. In my maternal line there is a Sarah Magdalene (instead of Mary), and a Moses or two.

Names I’ve Never Heard

A couple of the most unusual names I have found are Spotswood (male) and Telitha. Telitha is my maternal grandfather’s mother. I looked up her name — which can also be spelled Talitha, I think — it is a Biblical name. Apparently it is mentioned in the Gospel of Mark.  Two names that feel more like verbs than proper nouns are Comfort Claywell, born in the 1680s in the U.S. and Obedience Claywell listed in the 1860 in Cumberland County, Kentucky where my father grew up.

But, so far, I think the most unique name I have come across, in my opinion, is America Claywell, born in 1858 in Cumberland County, Kentucky.

Categories: American History, Family History, Genealogy | Tags: , , , , , ,

Free research tool lets you browse old newspapers

I am always looking for ways to research old stories and articles — and I stumbled across a site which has a searchable database of U.S. newspapers from 1836-1922. Chronicling America is a Library of Congress project that lets you search actual newspaper images — or even create pdfs of the page.

They also have a Flickr account with select images of old newspapers.

The Library of Congress invites you to explore ‘history’s first draft’ by looking at illustrated pages in old newspapers selected from our online collections. We welcome your tags and comments. There’s so much more to discover in yesteryear’s news!

One of the cool things I did when I was playing around on the newspaper site was conduct a search for my surname since it is fairly unique. Some of the stories I found were both interesting (I learned more about Tinker Dave Beaty) and disturbing. For example, there was a Claywell kid who murder a 13-year-old over a ‘Kick me’ sign that was placed on the Claywell teen’s back. This is the news blurb from a January 1906 edition of the Deseret Evening News:

Boy Stabs a Boy

Chicago, Jan. 6 – A dispatch to the Tribune from Dallas says:

Ollie Claywell, 14 years of age, last night stabbed Carl Ownes[sic], aged 13, and is in jail charged with murder. The boys were employed in the Texas Pacific general office. Someone pinned a placard on young Claywell’s back reading, “kick me”. The Owens boy kicked and a fight started. The boys were separated, but went into the street and the stabbing followed.

As disturbing as that story was it wasn’t the most disturbing one I uncovered. I was reading another story — this one involving a Claywell who shot a teen for allegedly stealing a 15 cent watermelon from a freight train (Blue Simmons Shot Friday Night By Frisco Guard: In Hospital). As I read the story, I glanced at the headline next to it and — let’s just say it is amazing how racist newspapers were in the 1920s. I won’t quote the headline (yes, it uses the N-word), but the story — actually more of an editorial — was blaming black teen females for the demise of the Democrat party in Missouri.

When using the site, remember to use the advance search feature. It will let you narrow down your terms, the state and years in a more refined manner. The only downside of the site, that I found, was the images can be slow to load and the convert to text feature is limited at best — but that should be expected since the newspapers are so old.

Categories: American History, Family History, Genealogy, Tools for historical search | Tags: , , ,

Significant Revolutionary War battle did not involve British soldiers

Yohn_Battle_of_Kings_MountainWhile researching my family tree, I learned about Andrew Beaty — a forefather on my maternal side — and his involvement in the Battle of Kings Mountain. Beaty was one of the Overmountain Men who walked miles to engage the Loyalists in this epic battle.

His story takes an odd turn because during the course of the battle he was bitten by a rattlesnake — although it is not recorded when he was injured, it is hard to imagine a person with enough grit and resilence to survive both the battle and a snake bite. But somehow he did.

The battle itself was also unique for several reasons.

It was one of the few major battles of the war fought entirely between Americans: no British troops served here…Kings Mountain is also unique in that large numbers of riflemen fought here. Rifles were not used much by the armies…

The use of rifles was extremely influential in the outcome of the battle as the National Park Service further explains,

The difference between a rifle and a musket is speed versus accuracy.  A rifle is slow to load, but very accurate.  Riflemen can hit a target at 200 or 300 yards.  Yet the rifle can only be fired once a minute.  A musket, with a smooth bore, is easy to load but inaccurate.  Muskets have an accurate range of about 100 yards, but can be fired up to three times a minute.

According to Andrew Beaty’s Revolutionary War pension application, Andrew served three stints with the Continental Line — each tour lasting three months. Although he was born in Pennsylvania, Andrew volunteered in Washington Co., Va., in the Spring of 1777 to serve under Capt. William Asher where the unit went to Little Station on Holston River as guards. Beaty re-entered the service in March 1779  as private under Capt. Abraham Bledsoe and Col. Shelby.

In his last tour of duty (1780) he participated in one of the most important battles of the War. He again volunteered in Washington County — just a short time before the battle of King’s Mountain — serving under Capt. George Maxwell and Col Shelby. Their unit was one of several pursuing a group of Loyalists fighting under British Commander Patrick Ferguson.

When the Patriots overtook the Loyalist, the battle was fought on an isolated ridge top in the Carolina backcountry. The sides were fairly even with about 1,000 soldiers each, but the manner in which they fought differed greatly. Initially the Loyalist had the advantage of higher ground and forced the Patriots to retreat down the mountain side by firing their muskets and charging with their bayonets. The Patriots, however fought back, eventually surrounding and overwhelming the American Loyalists by fighting frontier style — hiding in the trees and firing on the advancing Loyalist with deadly accuracy.

Thomas Jefferson credited the victory as a significant turning point in the War for Independence.

Categories: American Revolutionary War, Appalachia, Cumberland Plateau, Family History, Genealogy | Tags: , ,