Religion

Demons Plot For Your Soul In ‘The Screwtape Letters’

ThescrewtapelettersRegardless of your religious persuasion, The Screwtape Letters by C.S. Lewis is an excellent fictional read about all the behind the scenes work that goes on in the quest of securing the final destination of your soul. The book is an insightful, intriguing and even comical look into how Satan and his minions plot, scheme and tirelessly labor to ensure your eternal damnation.

The book is short — about 160 pages in paperback — and an excellent candidate for a weekend read. The book is written in a conversational tone and is simply a series of letters written by Screwtape, a senior level officer in Satan’s Army, to his nephew Wormwood. Screwtape is mentoring the young, inexperienced Wormwood in the fine art of deceit and manipulation as Wormwood struggles to bring his human patient back into the fold of “Our Father Below.”

British author Lewis wrote the book during WWII and, on occasion, uses the war as a backdrop for the story. Lewis puts a spotlight on the hypocrisy of his countrymen, fellow churchmen and people in general. In one WWII reference, Screwtape belittles the inclination of the British to say that ‘torture is too kind’ for their German enemies — and then offering a wounded German pilot tea and cigarettes.

“Do what you will,” Screwtape advises Wormwood, “there is going to be some benevolence, as well as some malice, in your patient’s soul. The great thing is to direct the malice to his immediate neighbors whom he meets every day and to thrust his benevolence out to the remote circumference, to people he does not know.”

In another letter, Screwtape addressing the laziness of some believers by commenting on their overreaction on points of doctrine. Screwtape tells Wormwood,

The real fun is working up hatred between those who say “mass” and those who say “holy communion” when neither party could possibly state the difference between say, Hooker’s doctrine and Thomas Aquinas’, in any form which would hold water for five minutes.

Even for non-Christians the book is a worthwhile read because, at it’s core, Lewis is examining why people succumb to their baser desires instead of nobler ones.

Author of the Chronicles of Narnia, Mere Christianity and Surprised by Joy, Lewis wrote more than 30 books and is one of the preeminent Christian minds of the 20th century. He died in 1963.

Get The Sequel

The Screwtape Letters was first published in 1942. If you’ve never read the book, grab a copy that includes the short 1959 sequel, Screwtape Proposes A Toast. In the Toast, originally published in the Saturday Evening Post in 1959, Screwtape gives an after-dinner speech at the Tempters’ Training College for young demons. Although, the sequel is more political (dealing with education institutional woes, the Cold War and Communism) than the book, it is another peek into Lewis’ moral views.

Categories: Books I have read, Religion | Tags:

Early Draft Of King James Bible Found In University’s Archives

KINGJAMESI find the history of the Bible — and it’s influence on the United States — interesting. Of course, one of the most popular versions is the King James Version. It was commissioned by King James and first published in 1611. Although, when published, it was not the official, authorized Bible of the church of England (the original title page of the 1611 King James Bible read: Appointed to be read in Churches), it nonetheless became the standard other Bibles were judged by– with some asserting it is the only true version of the Bible.

Old Notebook Reveals Translation Process

Recently Alan Miller, an assistant professor of English at Montclair State University in New Jersey, uncovered one of the earliest drafts of the King James Bible. The document was found in an “unassuming notebook held in an archive at the University of Cambridge.”

According to the New York Times, this artifact is unique and different from other surviving drafts because,

… it shows an individual translator’s initial puzzling over aspects of the Greek text of the Apocrypha, indicating the reasoning behind his translation choices, with reference to Hebrew and Latin as well.

Although creation of the Bible was commissioned by King James and the companies doing the work were told to do their work as a group, this new discovery shows that the way it was ordered to be done, and the way the work was actually completed, was different. This recently discovered notebook suggests that

“beyond a reasonable doubt” that at least some of the companies ignored the instructions and divided up the work among individuals…

Which suggests even the Bible was subjected to a labor-management clash since, just like today, the bosses handed out the orders and the workers finished the project the best way they knew how. It is important to note, though, that the discovery does not take away from the work that was completed — or diminish the integrity of the work. It just shows that sometimes, individuals — and not a team — labored over the correct translation of a passage.

The passage being translated in the document is from the Apocrypha. The Apocrypha was removed from most U.S. versions of the King James Bible by the mid-1800s.


Learn More

1760_Cambridge_Edition_King_James_Bible

The Bible’s role in the country is unmistakable, but what many do not realize is that the King James Bible was not the preferred translation of the first white settlers. The Puritans preferred, preached and studied, the Geneva Bible.

The Geneva Bible had two (and maybe more) distinctive qualities that made the Scriptures more accessible to the common person. First the Geneva Bible included marginal notes — called commentary in today’s vernacular — that interpreted various phrases and statements for the layperson. But, the single most important improvement the Geneva Bible implemented? Verses. Before the Geneva Bible, the Bible had not been divided into numerical verses.

If you are interested in understanding how the Bible, as we know it today, came into existence, read How the Bible Was Built.

Categories: Religion | Tags:

America’s Love/Hate Relationship With Christmas

larry_norman_So_Long_Ago_the_Garden_2_sized_“It used to be the birthday of the Man who saved our necks, now it stands for Santa Claus, you spell it with an X”Christmastime, Larry Norman, So Long Ago The Garden, 1973.


During the holidays, I see a lot of “put Christ in Christmas” posts on social media and often the posts have a very American slant to them — suggesting you’re not patriotic if you don’t like, type amen and share the post.

The posts, and some News organizations (I use the term news very, very loosely) even go so far as to claim there is a War on Christmas and Christians.

The Way Back Machine

Of course, in the world of social media and TV-generated non-issues, high page views and ratings are proof that God is on your side. From comedian Dennis Miller’s allegations that a Zombie nativity scene proves its ‘open season on Christians’ to Fox News coverage of Christians in Minnesota fighting back after an atheist forced the removal of a nativity scene from government property — one might get the feeling that Christians — and Christmas — are indeed under attack by left-wing, anti-American liberals.

But America’s history tells a much different story about Christmas.

In The Beginning

Despite commentators decrying this liberal-inspired, political-correctness-gone-wrong War on Christmas, the founding Christian settlers would view it all much differently. The Puritans, who came to this continent in search of religious freedom and a more pure, sacred and holy form of Christianity, viewed the celebration of Christmas as a thinly-veiled pagan holiday.

As a New York Times editorial notes,

The contemporary War on Christmas pales in comparison to the first — a war that was waged not by retailers but by Puritans who considered the destruction of Christmas necessary to the construction of their godly society.

An Excuse To Get Out Of Work?

In fact, when the Puritan settlers hit the shores of North America they wanted to rid the community of the celebration. Initially they simply ignored the day by working on it, but by the second Christmas, Governor William Bradford had a handful of new arrivals who, when the work day began on December 25, said it was against their conscious to work on the 25th. Bradford granted them a reprieve from the work day “until they were better informed.”

His willingness to accept their contrary belief was cut short though, when at noon, he found the people outside playing Christmas-related games. Bradford noted in his diary that if they believed in the day so much, they should be in their homes and not outside reveling in the streets.

Of course, Bradford was hardly the only influential settler who subscribed to the ‘Christmas is bad’ mindset. In 1687, Reverend Increase Mather, felt the festival was “highly dishonorable to the name of Christ.”

It’s Banned

The view of the religious majority decided to up the ante in colonial times. Instead of just saying Christmas was unholy, they passed a law preventing the celebration. In 1659, the Massachusetts Bay Colony passed a law which fined anyone celebrating Christmas. It read,

“For preventing disorders, arising in several places within this jurisdiction by reason of some still observing such festivals as were superstitiously kept in other communities, to the great dishonor of God and offense of others: it is therefore ordered by this court and the authority thereof that whosoever shall be found observing any such day as Christmas or the like, either by forbearing of labor, feasting, or any other way, upon any such account as aforesaid, every such person so offending shall pay for every such offence five shilling as a fine to the county.”

Holiday Catches On In The United States — 200 Years Later

When the law was revoked about two decades later, overall, the holiday was still not accepted on a large scale and even politicians, who tend to ride public opinion, did not acknowledge the holiday. In 1802, the House of Representatives worked on Christmas Day (talk about a War on Christmas) and as late as 1855, the New York Times noted that the Baptist and Methodist churches were closed on Christmas Day because they “do not accept the day as a holy one,” while Episcopal and Catholic churches were open and “decked with evergreens.”

Christmas became a national holiday in 1870.

Creating Something Out Of Nothing

Each year, Fox News starts its coverage about the fictitious ‘War on Christmas’ earlier and earlier — with Papa Bear Bill O’Reilly often leading the annual charge by September or October. In 2012 Fox Commentator Megyn Kelly help fan the flames by deciding that the fictional character, Santa Claus was white — adding as a footnote that Jesus was too.

Although, biblical scholars disagree with Kelly’s assessment on the color of Jesus’ skin, the jury is still out on Santa since, after all, Santa Claus isn’t real (sorry kids).


L51ngjkPowwL__SX323_BO1,204,203,200_earn More

For an interesting look at the various culture and historical events that shaped Christmas in the United States read, Christmas in America: A History by Penne L. Restad. The book notes that in America, the holiday has always been an “ambiguous meld of sacred thoughts and worldly actions.” For a lighthearted look at the modern Christmas traditions in the United States — including all those house lights — watch Chevy Chase’s Christmas Vacation.

Categories: American History, Religion | Tags: